[ Main ] Educator's Guide
Outreach Initiatives
[ Site Map ]
Geology | Lehigh River Watershed Explorations | Weather | Environmental Issues | Data Collection Activities
 
Organisms and pH tolerance

Most organisms have a well defined range of pH tolerance. If the pH falls below the tolerance range, death will occur due to respiratory or osmoregulatory failure (Kimmel, 1983). Low pH causes a disturbance of the balance of sodium and chloride ions in the blood of aquatic animals. At low pH, hydrogen ions may be taken into cells and sodium ions expelled (Morris et al., 1989). Mayflies are one of the most sensitive groups of aquatic insects to low pH; stoneflies and caddisflies are generally less sensitive to low pH. Mayflies and stoneflies that normally live in neutral water experience a greater loss of sodium in their blood when exposed to low pH than do acid-tolerant species of stoneflies, such as Leuctra and Amphinemura, whose sodium uptake is only slightly reduced by low pH (Sutcliffe and Hildrew, 1989).

Acid waters typically have fewer species and a lower abundance and biomass of macroinvertebrates than near-neutral pH waters. Attempts have been made to specifically identify limiting factors, and two factors investigated are interruption of the food chain and direct effects of low pH levels on aquatic life. Macroinvertebrates are often grouped by their feeding habits, and assemblages of invertebrates in acidified waters appear to be related to food availability. The fauna of low pH streams is usually composed of shredders (organisms that eat leaves that fall into the stream), collectors (organisms that filter or gather particles of organic matter from the water), and predators. Low pH tends to eliminate species that feed on algae (scrapers or grazers). Low pH may inhibit growth of bacteria which help break down leaves to make them more easily digestible and which also serve as a food source. These observations led early investigators to theorize that low pH levels reduced the food sources for invertebrates, thereby indirectly reducing their numbers. This is partially true; however, more recent studies have shown that direct effects of low pH on aquatic life are more critical than indirect effects on food sources (Rosemond et al., 1992).

Cooper and Wagner (1973) studied the distribution of fish in Pennsylvania streams affected by acid mine drainage. They found fish species were severely impacted at pH 4.5 to 5.5; ten species showed some tolerance to pH 5.5 or less; 38 species were found at pH 5.6 to 6.4; and 68 species were found only at pH greater than 6.4 (Table 4.1). They found that a pH of 4.5 and total acidity of 15 mg/L accounted for complete loss of fish in 90% of streams studied. Although no concentrations of metals were taken into account, Cooper and Wagner indicated that the absence of fish in acidified waters can be related to dissolved metals at certain pH levels. They also indicated that sulfates, a major constituent of acid mine drainage, did not become toxic to fish until concentrations exceeded the saturation level of several thousand mg/L.

The primary causes of fish death in acid waters is loss of sodium ions from the blood and loss of oxygen in the tissues (Brown and Sadler, 1989). Acid water also increases the permeability of fish gills to water, adversely affecting gill function. Ionic imbalance in fish may begin at a pH of 5.5 or higher, depending on the tolerance of the species; severe anoxia will occur below pH 4.2 (Potts and McWilliams, 1989). Low pH that is not directly lethal may adversely affect fish growth rates and reproduction (Kimmel, 1983).


Return to AMD Stakeholders' page

 

Curricular Activities | Lehigh River Photojournal | Water Quality | GIS | History | River Exploration
LEO EnviroSci Inquiry is brought to you by the Lehigh Environmental Initiative at Lehigh University.
Copyright ©2000-2011 Lehigh Environmental Initiative at Lehigh University. All rights reserved.